Legal Opinion
Diamond B-Y Ranches v. Tooele County
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided April 29, 2004No. Case No. 20030578-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 Diamond B-Y Ranches asserts that it is entitled to compensation under federal and state “taking” jurisprudence because Tooele County’s denial of Diamond’s request for a conditional use permit to operate a gravel pit rendered its property valueless. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the County based on its determination that Diamond had no protected property interest in the permit and did not provide sufficient evidence to allow approval of the permit. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Diamond owns over 190 acres of land in Tooele County,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stevens v. LaVerkin CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- Arnell v. Salt Lake County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Town of Gurley v. M & N Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012