Legal Opinion

Sewell Coal Company v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission, Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1982No. 81-1592PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

A federal mine inspector cited the Sewell Coal Company for two violations of safety standards. An administrative law judge vacated the citations because he concluded that compliance with the standards was impossible under the circumstances. On review of this decision, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission ac*1068cepted the administrative law judge’s factual findings but held that compliance had not been impossible.1 The administrative law judge then imposed a $1 penalty for each violation, and Sewell petitioned this court for relief. We affirm.2

I

From December…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Lucas Coal Company v. Interior Board of Mine Operations AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walker Stone Company, Inc. v. The Secretary of Labor Federal Mine Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. SnyderGeneral Corp. v. Century Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
  3. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, on Behalf of James W. Parker and Joe E. Brown v. Metric Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Asarco, Inc.-Northwestern Mining Department v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Asarco, Inc. v. Federal Mine Safety And Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API