Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Unimax, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 29, 1988No. 87-1751PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HARTMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff appeals from entry of summary judgment (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2 — 1005) in favor of defendants. Defendant Unimax, Inc. (Unimax), is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Schaumburg, Illinois. Codefendant Tim Dern (Dern) is president and a cofounder of Unimax. It is comprised of two separate spheres of activity: Unimax Buyers’ Service (Buyers’ Service) and Unimax Matrix (Matrix), a multilevel marketing plan.
In approximately April 1986, Unimax instituted the Buyers’ Service, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jenkins v. WuIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Dare to Be Great, Inc. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. HancockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Challenge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- People Ex Rel. Fahner v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. KnopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Scentura Creations, Inc. v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- People v. KnopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Scentura Creations, Inc. v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001