Legal Opinion
Houck v. Birmingham
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 11, 1950No. 4-9223Published
1Opinion of the Court
230 S.W.2d 952 (1950)
HOUCK.
v.
BIRMINGHAM et al.
No. 4-9223.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
June 12, 1950.
Dissenting Opinion July 11, 1950.
Holland & Taylor, Blytheville, for appellant.
Claude F. Cooper and Frank C. Douglas, Blytheville, for appellees.
MILLWEE, Justice.
Appellant, R. L. Houck, owns and operates a large farm near Luxora in Mississippi County, Arkansas. He is a stockholder and director in Planters Cooperative, Inc., a cooperative organized under Act 153 of 1939, Ark.Stats. Secs. 77-1001 to 77-1025. The cooperative operates a cotton gin about 4½ miles from the farm owned by appellant.
Appellee…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Uniform Printing & Supply Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Midland Cooperative Wholesale v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
- Tinsley v. CraigeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Barnhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Hammock v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.