Legal Opinion
Creswell v. Doe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injury and for wrongful death, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 30, 1962, which granted the defendant MVAIC’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action is barred by the two-year Statute of Limitations imposed by section 130 of the Decedent Estate Law. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; and motion to dismiss the complaint denied. The time of) the defendant MVAIC to answerl the complaint is extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. On June 26, 1959…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Arnold v. Mayal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Velez v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Trepel v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Schultz v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1976
- Betances v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.