Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1965No. Nos. 41324, 41328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

These causes, brought here by different insurance carriers as separate proceedings to review the same order of the State Industrial Court, were ordered consolidated for disposition. So far as pertinent to our consideration hereof, the trial judge’s order submitted here for revi'éw, contains these findings of fact and conclusions of law: (1) claimant, when injured, was in thé employ of an uninsured partnership which was then engaged in a business' defined as hazardous by statute; (2) while so employed, claimant sustained a compensable injury; (3) at the time of his injury,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCallum Forber v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Hughes Motor Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. City of Tulsa v. WilkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reid v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Coker-Mitchell Company v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Maxwell v. Faith Transport, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API