Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1988No. 469A86PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

We note at the outset that the defendant did not object or assign error to the consolidation of these cases for trial. We do not consider the question of whether this joinder was proper.

The defendant first assigns error to the admission into evidence of his tennis shoes which were found in his bedroom in the house in which he was staying. The defendant objected to the admission of this evidence during the first trial and a voir dire hearing was held out of the presence of the jury. Sterling Cartrette testified that he was a detective with the Columbus County Sheriffs Department.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. WileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. BogleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. AugustineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API