Legal Opinion
Bogart v. Hinds
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided November 14, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.
The complaint alleges that the complainant Smith was the original and first inventor of certain new and useful improvements in electrical machines, for which letters patent were duly issued to him; that thereafter, on the thirteenth day of May, 1873, he assigned to the complainant Bogart the full and exclusive right and liberty to make, use, and sell the patented machine for the specific purpose of lighting gas-jets, “which said instrument was duly recorded on the twenty-first day of May, 1873, in the patent-office of the United States, in Liber W., 16, p. 33, as by said instrument, with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Moore v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Turner v. FendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Nelson v. McMannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
- Wilder v. McCormickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1846
3Cited by6 opinions
- Park-In-Theatres, Inc. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Straus v. American Publishers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Curtiss Aeroplane & Motor Corp. v. United Aircraft Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Germain v. WilgusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
- Heaton Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Schlocht-MeyerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.