Blackmon v. KUKUA
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANIS GRAHAM JACK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants Kukua, Livingston, Latorre, E. Garza, and M. Garza’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (D.E. 141), and Plaintiff Eugene Blackmon’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (D.E. 142). For the reasons explained below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (D.E. 141.) Specifically, Defendants’ Motion (D.E. 141) is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Livingston, Latorre, and Mark Garza. Said Defendants are dismissed from the lawsuit. Defendants’ Motion (D.E. 141) is DENIED with respect to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ramona Hinojosa v. Brad LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- (PC)Cannon v. GallahgerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Garry Baker v. Bryan Collier, et al.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2026
- Leroy Hicks, Jr v. Ed Gonzalez, et alDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2026
- Ramona Hinojosa v. Brad LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.