Legal Opinion
Lord Mfg. Co. v. Stimson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 1947No. Civ. Nos. 23451, 31982, 36572PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Associate Justice.
These are three renegotiation cases, one each for the years 1942, 1943 and 1944. The points involved in the first two relate to the existence or amounts of excessive profits. The Government proposes to recover its claim by offsetting the amounts against sums due by it to the plaintiff. Under these circumstances, the cases are controlled by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the Mine Safety and Waterman cases.1 They must, therefore, be dismissed.2
The third case, No. 36572, relating to 1944, raises a different question. The Government, acting by the appropriate…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kenyon Instrument Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Kenyon Instrument Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951