Legal Opinion

(PC) Hearns v. Whisnand

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 30, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00313Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE L. HEARNS, e t al., CASE NO. 1:20-cv-0313 JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT A RESPONSE 13 v. 14 ANDREW WHISNAND, et al., (Doc. 1) 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 16 Clarence L. Hearns and Curtis Boyd governmental employees and/or entities violated their 17 constitutional rights.1 (Doc. 1.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought by 18 inmates seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental 19 entity. 28…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API