United States v. Harold Scallon

This case presents the narrow question whether the denial of a defendant’s motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) to modify the terms of supervised release imposéd as part of the original sentence falls within the scope of the defendant’s waiver, as part of his plea agreement, of his right to appeal his conviction and sentence and to contest his sentence in any post-conviction proceeding. We hold that it does, and we therefore dismiss this appeal.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant-Appellant Harold Earl Scallon pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written agreement, to possession of material…