Legal Opinion

United States v. Hildenbrand

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 13, 2008No. 07-10210, 07-10211PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Barbara Hildenbrand and Gerald Stone appeal their guilty plea convictions for defrauding the Department of Housing and Urban Development, conspiring to steal from an organization receiving federal funds, and tax evasion primarily on the basis that the factual resumes submitted in support of their guilty pleas are insuffieient to support their convictions of these crimes. We disagree and affirm appellants’ convictions. Because of our disposition of this threshold issue and the appeal waiver in their plea agreements, we do not reach any other issues…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Watson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. MarekCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Fischer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. BaymonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. United States v. Alex McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. TrejoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. BahelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API