Legal Opinion

Trost v. Brey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1923No. 23,407PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action to cancel and annul a deed and a decree of the probate court insofar as it distributed the land conveyed to the heirs of the grantee in the deed. Findings were made in plaintiff’s favor. The appeal is from the order denying defendant’s alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial.

The action, is in behalf of Xavier Brey, an incompetent, by his guardian ad litem. The defendants are the wife and daughter, the heirs of the grantee in the deed attacked. The facts not in dispute are these: About 1886 Xavier Brey and his brother George came to Redwood county from Bavaria. George was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Enkema v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Shaughnessy v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Pray v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Crane v. VeleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Trimbo v. TrimboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rebne v. RebneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Fenrick v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Big Stone County Bank Ex Rel. Veigel v. HobanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Clark v. QuadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. UtneDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API