Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Brabham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 5, 1923No. 11327PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action for foreclosure of a mortgage given by the defendant, Martha Brabham, to the defendant, People’s Bank, to secure the payment of a bond for $150.00, dated January 12, 1918, due October 15, 1918, recorded on the day of its execution, and assigned by the People’s Bank on October 13, 1918, to the plaintiff, George W. Wilson.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the Master’s report.

The authorities are in hopeless conflict upon the question whether or not a subsequent mortgagee can rely upon a satisfaction by the mortgagee of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Singleton v. SingletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Citizens Savings Bank v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cogswell v. CannadySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Morris v. CarlisleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Hahn v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Hahn v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Neely v. LoveSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API