Legal Opinion

Crittenden v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1918No. Civ. No. 2327PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

ZOOK, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants after demurrer sustained to their amended complaint. The action is one for damages for personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Crittenden as a result of her being struck by an automobile driven by Thomas C. Murphy, the minor son of defendants. The negligent driving of the automobile by the son, the happening of the accident, and the consequent injury to plaintiff are properly alleged in the complaint, and the sole question on this appeal is the sufficiency of the complaint to charge the parents with liability for the son’s tort.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mundy v. Pirie-Slaughter Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Arkin v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Myers v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Ulman v. LindemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API