Legal Opinion

Hensler v. Brooks

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1997No. 39A01-9701-CV-6PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appeilants-defendants Robert J. and Carol Sue Hensler and Carl W. and Diana Risk (Henslers) appeal the trial court’s determination that they had obstructed a public right-of-way in Brooksburg, Indiana. Specifically, the Henslers contend that the evidence did not support the trial court’s judgment.

FACTS 1

In 1974, the Henslers purchased property in Brooksburg, Indiana. Their land was bordered on the south by the Ohio River, on the east by the Indian-Kentuck Creek, and on the north by the platted lots of the town of Brooksburg.

In March of 1993, after the Henslers placed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Bd. of Com'rs of Monroe Cty. v. HattonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Szakaly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Smith v. LowryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. City of Cannelton v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API