Hensler v. Brooks
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appeilants-defendants Robert J. and Carol Sue Hensler and Carl W. and Diana Risk (Henslers) appeal the trial court’s determination that they had obstructed a public right-of-way in Brooksburg, Indiana. Specifically, the Henslers contend that the evidence did not support the trial court’s judgment.
FACTS 1
In 1974, the Henslers purchased property in Brooksburg, Indiana. Their land was bordered on the south by the Ohio River, on the east by the Indian-Kentuck Creek, and on the north by the platted lots of the town of Brooksburg.
In March of 1993, after the Henslers placed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bd. of Com'rs of Monroe Cty. v. HattonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Szakaly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Smith v. LowryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Cannelton v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005