Legal Opinion

Bird v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 10, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00114Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE KEITH L. BIRD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos. 3:20-CV-114 ) 3:17-CR-013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Keith L. Bird’s (“Petitioner’s”) pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [Doc. 1; Criminal Docket (“Crim.”) Doc. 573].1 The United States has responded in opposition [Doc. 7], and Petitioner filed a reply [Doc. 8]. For the reasons below, Petitioner’s § 2255 motion [Doc. 1; Crim. Doc. 573] will be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND In…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API