Legal Opinion
State v. Quincy
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 30, 2004No. 52484-4-1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 P.3d 353 (2004)
122 Wash.App. 395
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jesse QUINCY, Appellant.
No. 52484-4-1.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 14, 2004.
Publication Ordered July 30, 2004.
Jason Saunders, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Kathleen Webber, Everett, WA, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
A computer-generated tally of items stolen from a retailer who uses the same computer system to price goods for sale is admissible as evidence of the value of the stolen goods under the business records exception to the rule against hearsay.
BACKGROUND
Loss prevention personnel at a…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. QuincyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HowertonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Citimortgage v. Paul MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In re Welfare of M.R.Washington Supreme Court · 2022
- Patrick White v. Granite FallsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington, V M.j.t.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.