Legal Opinion
United States v. James M. Laster (99-6244) and Jerry Lear (99-6247)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 26, 2001No. 99-6244, 99-6247PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSiler, J., joined by Stagg, D. J.,
MOORE, J. (pp. 532-35), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Jerry Lear and James M. Laster appeal their convictions and sen-fences for drug offenses. This published opinion sets forth the court’s ruling as to defendants’ claims that the district court erroneously admitted records involving the purchase and attempted purchase of hy-driodic acid, and the impact of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), on the calculation of their respective sentences. Our decision concerning defendants’ remaining appellate issues…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Moyosore Ismoila Segun Debowale Nuratu Lawanson, United States of America v. Moyosore IsmoilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Benjamin Y. Owusu (98-3356), Larry Latham (98-3847), and Anthony Latham (98-3850)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jose Ramirez, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Cheryl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Mike DarwichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- People v. KattMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. Russell CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Montel Lavelle HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.