Legal Opinion

City of Wilmer v. Laidlaw Waste System (Dallas), Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 18, 1994No. 05-93-00997-CVPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

The City of Wilmer, Texas appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. and Eco Land, Inc. in this suit brought by Laidlaw and Eco to declare void certain annexation ordinances passed by the City. In seven points of error, the City contends that the trial court erred in granting Laidlaw’s and Eco’s motion for summary judgment and denying its motion for summary judgment because (1) Laidlaw and Eco had no standing to assert a private cause of action to set aside the annexation ordinances, (2) the statutory annexation area…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rizkallah v. Conner, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  3. Green v. Industrial Specialty Contractors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  5. Washington DC Party Shuttle, LLC, Party Shuttle Tours, LLC and Creativerse Internet Systems, LLC v. Iguide Tours, LLC, Tyree Cook, and Abise Eshetu, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API