Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert McCulligan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 6, 2001No. 00-2562PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant contends that he was convicted of one crime but sentenced for another. We agree, and will remand for resentenc-ing.
I
Several Deputy U.S. Marshals arrived at an apartment complex in West Norriton, Pennsylvania on June 17, 1999 to arrest Robert McCulligan, who was wanted for a violation of supervised release. As McCul-ligan attempted to drive his vehicle out of an entrance to the complex, Deputies O’Donnell and Kurtz blocked his path with their vehicle and ordered him to stop. McCulligan responded by driving rapidly in reverse. The deputies…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Montel Lavelle HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Roosevelt D. ValleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Nazir Ahmad Popal v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States Bureau of Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.