Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Cor. v. Beasley
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 14, 1942No. 14083PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth:, Justice.
The writ of error presents two major questions for decision, to wit: (1) Did the renewal of the charter make the Bank of Grantville one incorporated under the banking act of 1919, so that the amendment of 1935 applies to the liability of its stockholders to depositors? (2) Does the amendment of 1935 have a retrospective application?
Article 10 of the 1919 banking act authorizes any bank to renew its charter for a period of thirty years by filing application for such renewal with the secretary of State six months before the expiration of its charter. It requires that the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Cutsinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spengler v. Employers Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Alexis Inc. v. WerbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Smith v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Hagans v. Excelsior Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Sharpe v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.