Hollins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEARN, C.J.:
Maria Hollins appeals from a jury verdict in favor of WalMart in this action for negligent hiring and retention. We affirm.
FACTS
Ten-year-old Jane Doe accompanied her mother, Hollins, and sister to the Wal-Mart located on Forest Drive in Columbia. While her mother and sister shopped in another area of the store, Doe browsed through the merchandise in the electronics department. There, Randall, a Wal-Mart employee, touched Doe’s private areas and began masturbating in her presence. As a result of this incident, Hollins commenced negligent hiring and retention claims against Wal-Mart…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Degenhart v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burke v. AnMed HealthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Winthrop University Trustees for the State v. Pickens Roofing & Sheet Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Hollins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Hollins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011