Legal Opinion

Hollins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 22, 2008No. 4473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

Maria Hollins appeals from a jury verdict in favor of WalMart in this action for negligent hiring and retention. We affirm.

FACTS

Ten-year-old Jane Doe accompanied her mother, Hollins, and sister to the Wal-Mart located on Forest Drive in Columbia. While her mother and sister shopped in another area of the store, Doe browsed through the merchandise in the electronics department. There, Randall, a Wal-Mart employee, touched Doe’s private areas and began masturbating in her presence. As a result of this incident, Hollins commenced negligent hiring and retention claims against Wal-Mart…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Degenhart v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burke v. AnMed HealthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Winthrop University Trustees for the State v. Pickens Roofing & Sheet Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Hollins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Hollins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API