Larry T. Varnum v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1ConcurrenceHoffman, Senior District Judge
Daniel Webster once stated, “There is nothing so powerful as the truth, and nothing so strange.”1 This sentiment is particularly apropos in light of appellant’s predicament. While I concur in the result reached by the court, I am compelled to express my concern that the scope of the majority’s holding not be expansively interpreted. I concur on the grounds that, based on the affidavit of Paul McAllister, appellant’s state law claim does not fail as a matter of law and that the state claim is not pre-empted by federal law.
I
Florida law is consistent with the general rule that an actionable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.