Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation v. Warren

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 28, 1998No. 89,049PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimms, J.

¶ 1 May the State of Oklahoma, through statute, constitutionally deny an application for a concealed handgun license, because the applicant has been indicted by a Federal Grand Jury for the crime of conspiracy to commit arson, arrested and charged for the felony, but he has been acquitted by a jury within three years of the date of the application?

¶ 2 We answer in the negative.

¶ 3 The statute at issue, Tit. 21 O.S.Supp. 1997 § 1290.11(A) provides:

“A The following conditions shall preclude a person from being eligible for a concealed handgun license pursuant to the provisions of the Oklahoma…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. State v. RicehillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Kellogg v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mosby v. DevineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. Mehdipour v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. State v. RichardSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Mehdipour v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. ConocoPhillips Co. v. HenryDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API