Legal Opinion

Conners v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 6, 1905No. 547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, Circuit Judge.

This was a petition filed under the provisions of the Tucker Act of March 3, 1887, c. 359, 24 Stat. 505 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 752], The allegation that the United States made a contract with the petitioners was in substance as follows: The said Conners thereupon in writing offered and bid to do the work for the sum of $39,920, and if the railroad was omitted,’to deduct the sum of $700, and if the fireproofing of the lumber was omitted, to deduct .the sum of $900; all said options being parts of the one and only bid of your petitioners, and the said United States…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Folger v. Columbian InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. United States v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Merrill v. BullockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. McCue v. WhitwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. District of Columbia v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  2. Jefferson Fire Ins. v. Bierce & Sage, Inc.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1910
  3. Arizonans for Fair Elections v. HobbsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Aurore Sims v. Assia Souily-Lefave; Around Vegas, LLC-1 Day in Las VegasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API