Legal Opinion

David HICKMAN, Appellant, v. ELECTRONIC KEYBOARDING, INC., Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1984No. 83-2376PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

David Hickman brought this suit against Electronic Keyboarding for race discrimination under Title YII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The District Court 1 granted summary judgment in favor of Electronic Keyboarding, holding that the action was barred by res judicata. Hickman contends on appeal that he was neither a party nor in privity with a party in prior proceedings before the Missouri Commission on Human Rights (MCHR or the Commission) and the state courts. These proceedings ended with a determination that defendant had not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Drainage District No. 1 Reformed v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Ancom, Inc., a Corporation v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lane v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Noranda Aluminum, Inc. v. RainsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Eduardo P. TRUJILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Lane v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. Gahr v. TrammelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API