Legal Opinion

Rehard v. Rini

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1955No. 23343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By DOYLE, J:

This case involves the law relative to restrictive covenants in a deed.

Prior to the year 1923, The Lake Shore Boulevard Co. owned a parcel of land in the then village of Euclid, Ohio, which it subdivided into a number of sublots and recorded a plat thereof. The plat contained no covenants of restriction.

On April 21, 1923, the Company-Owner transferred title to all of sublot 47 to William A. and Mary Meyer. This lot fronted on Lake Shore Boulevard (a highway running generally northeast and southwest) *116a distance of 152.74 feet, abutted on the intersecting East 266th Street (a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Graham v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  3. Wright v. PfrimmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Puddington v. VielbigNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Miami Valley Hospital SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Jay Realty v. J.P.S. Properties Diversified, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Smith v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API