Legal Opinion
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 12, 1970No. Civ. A. Nos. 137-69-A to 139-69-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
OREN R. LEWIS, District Judge.
The question here is whether the plaintiff’s published tariff or the pre-existing agreement between the involved railroads governs the charge for “no bill” cars at the Cincinnati interchange.
*974The plaintiff, The Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, a subsidiary of the Southern Railway System, operates the interchange facility in Cincinnati, Ohio, at which railroad freight cars of plaintiff’s and defendants’ lines are interchanged. The defendants are The Chesapeake and Ohio, The Baltimore and Ohio, and Penn Central…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Morris Crain v. Blue Grass Stockyards Company and Clay-Wachs Stockyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co., the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Penn Central Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971