Legal Opinion
Neptune City v. Mestice
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 2, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
31 N.J. Super. 6 (1954)
105 A.2d 685
BOROUGH OF NEPTUNE CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM R. MESTICE, APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 24, 1954.
Decided June 2, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. William R. Mestice, appellant, pro se.
Mr. Joseph R. Megill argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.
The defendant was evidently found guilty by the magistrate of the Municipal Court of the Borough of Neptune City on October 1, 1953 of violating the zoning…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Newark v. PulvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- In Re Application of KershnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- In Re Estate of PfizerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- State v. JaniecSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- City of Absecon v. VetteseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Delaware Twp. v. NeeldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Automatic Washer Serv., Inc. v. Brunswick Burl., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Grogan v. William J. Scully, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Mestice v. Bd. of Adjustment of Neptune CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955