Legal Opinion

Grumbert & Huey v. Kilgore

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

October Term, 1886, No. 15, W. D. Error to the Common Pleas, No. 1, of Allegheny County to review a judgment on a verdict for plaintifi for $500, in an action on the case to recover damages to property through alleged negligence in mining coal. The action was brought by Watson Kilgore against William Huey, Hubert Gumbert, and others, partners, doing business as Gumbert & Huey.

Read the full summary

October Term, 1886, No. 15, W. D. Error to the Common Pleas, No. 1, of Allegheny County to review a judgment on a verdict for plaintifi for $500, in an action on the case to recover damages to property through alleged negligence in mining coal. The action was brought by Watson Kilgore against William Huey, Hubert Gumbert, and others, partners, doing business as Gumbert & Huey. The following facts appeared on the trial in the court below, before Collier, J.: In 1859, Alexander McClure, Sr., owning two farms containing together about 211 acres of land, sold all coal underlying the same to…

1Per curiam

Having with care examined the rulings and charge of the learned judge of the court below, and finding them entirely consonant with the rulings of this court, we adopt them as a sound exposition of the law, and, as a legitimate sequence, affirm the judgment.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Kansas Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Ohio Collieries Co. v. CockeOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Pike v. Hart & HébertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API