Legal Opinion

Ohio Collieries Co. v. Cocke

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1923No. Nos. 17572 and 17408Published

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

In the case of Ohio Collieries Company v. Elizabeth Cocke the errors complained of in this record are six in number:

“(1) Error of the trial court in not separating and definitely stating the issues.
“(2) Error of the trial court in stating 'to the jury that a certain controverted fact had been proved.
“(3) Error of the trial court in charging the jury on the law of negligence.
“(4) Error of the trial court in charging the jury as to the measure of damages in subsidence cases.
“ (5) The excessive and unwarranted verdict not supported by the evidence, and due to the erroneous charge of the court.
“…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Wilms v. JessIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Collins v. Gleason Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Stonegap Colliery Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API