Legal Opinion

State v. Warnock

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 26, 1972No. 538-2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Defendant, Bert Warnock, Jr., appeals a jury conviction and sentence imposed for the crime of unlawfully selling dangerous drugs. The information was based upon an alleged violation of RCW 69.40.060, a provision of the Dangerous Drug Act which was subsequently repealed by the Laws of 1971,1st Ex. Sess., RCW 69.50.606, effective May 21, 1971. Defendant’s sentence was imposed in accordance with this later enactment, which is known as the “Uniform Controlled Substances Act.” (RCW 69.50.)

The state’s case rested solely upon the testimony of Barry G. Beck, that he had purchased four LSD pills from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Willis K. Baker, Jr., and Mervin "Bud" Cornelsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. State v. GladstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re VickersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. CatterallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. LangworthyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. State v. KinseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API