Gaines v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of Vermont
Original Petition for an unrestricted new trial, on the ground of newly discovered evidence, in the case of R. N. Baldwin v. J. E. Gaines, in which there was a judgment for the plaintiff in the court below, and which judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court on the question of liability, and reversed as to damages. 92 Vt. 61. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
The case of Baldwin v. Gaines for malpractice was tried in the county court at the September Term, 1916, and the plaintiff had judgment. The case came to this Court on exceptions, and at our October Term, 1917, the judgment was reversed as to damages, and the cause was remanded for a new trial on that question only. Baldwin v. Gaines, 92 Vt. 61, 102 Atl. 338.
We have here a petition for an unrestricted retrial. We are informed -by the brief of the petitioner that the remanded case has been continued in county court pending the determination of this petition for an enlargement of the reversal.
Un…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ryder v. Vermont Last Block Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Cross v. Passumpsic Fibre Leather Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Gilfillan v. Gilfillan's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Marshal v. Dalton Paper MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Griffin v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Johnson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1936
- Shea v. PiletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Duchaine v. PhoenixSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.