Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1918No. 4837PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of perjury and allotted two years confinement in the penitentiary.

Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney General that the appeal be dismissed because appellant's recognizance was not entered properly upon the minutes of the trial court. The matter is in confusion as to whether it was or was not so entered The transcript contains a recognizance. The State attacks the verity of this and says as a matter of fact it was not so entered. The judge certifies, as does the clerk, in addition to the record, that defendant and his sureties came into open court and were duly…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hodge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Brannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Dekle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. People v. MellonNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1939
  5. Broz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API