Legal Opinion
Boyer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided May 31, 1995No. CV294-147PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Julie Boyer, filed this Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) action against Defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), alleging that MetLife’s calculation of the reasonable and customary charge for her surgery was arbitrary and capricious. Boyer seeks to recover unpaid benefits, prejudgment interest, and attorney’s fees.
Before the Court is MetLife’s Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As discussed below, Defendant’s motion will be DENIED.
FACTS
At all times relevant to this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Cornelious Howard v. Bp Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clarke v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1998