Howard E. Chandler v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Dissent
KASOLD, Chief Judge, with whom GREENE, Judge,
joins, dissenting:
Certainly, matters that are settled should remain settled unless there is very good reason to unsettle them. See Citizens United v. FEC, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 876, 911-912, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010) (“[Precedent is to be respected unless the most convincing of reasons demonstrates that adherence to it puts [the Court] on a course that is sure error.”); see also Arizona v. Rumsey, 467 U.S. 203, 212, 104 S.Ct. 2305, 81 L.Ed.2d 164 (1984) (“[A]ny departure from the doctrine of stare deci-sis demands special justification.”). Equally…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.