Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Salih Sevencan v. Victor Herbert, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 30, 2002No. Docket 01-2491Published

1Concurring in the judgmentPooler, Circuit Judge

I concur in the judgment. Regretfully, I cannot concur in the majority’s reasoning, which has two central flaws. First, the majority ignores the careful factual record made by the district court and thus sweeps far more widely than necessary to resolve this appeal. More important, the majority opinion misconstrues and conflicts with Yung v. Walker, 296 F.3d 129 (2d Cir.2002) and impermissibly restricts the authority granted to the district court by 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2).

To explain why the record below justifies affirmance without any consideration of the parameters of Yung, I will briefly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Peter Vidal v. Joseph Williams, Superintendent of Fulton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Pedro Nieblas v. Carl A. Smith, Superintendent, Marcy Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API