Legal Opinion
Emrit v. Devos
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 6, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2020-0417Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Ronald Satish Emrit, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-417 (UNA) ) Betsy DeVos et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’s pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring the court to dismiss an action “at any time” it determines that subject matter jurisdiction is wanting). “Federal courts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward Haase v. William S. Sessions, Director, F.B.I.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.