Legal Opinion

United States v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 8, 1917No. 1530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Eynchburg; Henry Clay McDowell, Judge. Action by the United States against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. Judgment for defendant, and the United States brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.

This is an action instituted in th<; District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia to recover penalties for alleged violations of the “Safety Appliance Act.” The plaintiff alleges 12 causes of action and demands $1,200 aggregate penalties. Eleven of these causes are alike, alleging the violation of section 2 of the federal Safety Appliance Act approved March 2, 1903, demanding judgment.for $1,100 aggregate penalties. The eighth cause of action is in a class by itself (involving defective coupler, finally disposed of by the lower court).

Sectio…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Transportation Union v. Drew Lewis, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. New York Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Auslender v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. United States v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API