Legal Opinion

In Re Hicks

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided June 1, 2007No. 12-42575PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

CHARLES E. RENDLEN, III, Bankruptcy Judge.

On May 2, 2007, the United States Trustee (the “UST”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) (the “Motion”) [Docket # 17] in the above-referenced bankruptcy case (the “Case”). On May 18, 2007, the chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”) filed a Response to the Motion [Docket # 31], in which the Trustee made no substantive argument in support of the Motion but requested that the Motion be granted only upon payment of the Trustee’s approved fees and expenses. The Debtor filed no response to the Motion. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stapleton v. Mundy (In Re Mundy)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re WalkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
  2. McDow v. Williams (In Re Williams)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
  3. In Re BarbutesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. In Re HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2009
  5. In Re LinvilleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API