Railroad Co. v. McKinley
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
In Insurance Company v. Dunn (19 Wall. 214), it was held that under the act of March 2, 1867 (14 Stat. 568), a cause could be removed from a State court to the Circuit Court after a trial and judgment in the State court, if before the removal the first judgment had been set aside or vacated, and the right to a new trial perfected, and in Vannevar v. Bryant (21 Wall. 41), that after one trial the right to another must be perfected before a demand foi removal could be made.
In this case there had'been one trial and a judgment, for McKinley, the plaintiff below, against the railroad company in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Vannevar v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Stone v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Elliott v. Stocks & Bro.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Partlow v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.