Legal Opinion

Arbogast v. Sky Zone, LLC

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided July 11, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00427Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON NATALIE ARBOGAST, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00427 SKY ZONE, LLC; CIRCUSTRIX HOLDINGS, LLC; CIRCUSTRIX, LLC; and JOHN DOE MANUFACTURERS 1–10, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending is defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 13), filed September 15, 2023. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts On August 23, 2019, plaintiff Natalie Arbogast visited an indoor trampoline park in Charleston, West Virginia, operated by Fitness, Fun and Freedom, doing business as Sky Zone,…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API