Legal Opinion

Murphy Laboratories, Inc. v. Emery Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1951No. Civ. No. 7945Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

This is an action for damages for breach of warranty. This case was tried before the Court, without a jury, and the parties were represented by counsel. Based upon the oral testimony, exhibits, documentary evidence and admissions of the, parties by their pleadings and in open Court, and in compliance with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., I find the facts specially and state my conclusions of law as follows:

*652Findings of Fact

1. - Murphy Laboratories, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as “Murphy”) a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Wright v. Bristol Patent Leather Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Truscon Steel Co. v. Fuhrmann & Schmidt Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Harding, Whitman & Co. v. York Knitting MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Comfort Springs Corp. v. Allancraft Furniture Shop, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API