Legal Opinion

Foster v. Nash

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided June 18, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00818Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION LARRY FOSTER Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-00818 FRANK NASH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is a Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 12] filed by Defendants Slurry Pavers, Inc. (“Slurry”) and Frank Nash, a Slurry employee. Plaintiff Larry Foster has failed to respond and the time to do so has elapsed. The Motion is now ripe for adjudication. The Motion is GRANTED for the reasons that follow. I. Background On October 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Anthony Dash v. Floyd Mayweather, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Thomas M. Stone v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Thomas M. Stone v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API