Legal Opinion
Nicholas v. Saul Stone & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 7, 2000No. 98-5390PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
POLLAK, District Judge.
Appellants seek review of a judgment of the District Court of New Jersey granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. The District Court dismissed the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over the two individual defendants, and for failure to state any claims upon which relief could be granted against the other defendants. We conclude that it was proper for the District Court to grant the motion to dismiss, and hence we will affirm.
I. Facts
We begin by summarizing the principal facts alleged in the amended complaint—…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P 27,378 Glenn Damato, Deborah Damato, Ann De La Garza v. John Hermanson, First Commercial Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Raymond J. MastenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Matter of Lake States Commodities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Alfred D. Lopez and Jeanie Reitzell v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Klein & Co. Futures, Inc. v. Bd. of Trade of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Eastern Trading Company v. Refco, Inc., and Refco Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Calle Gracey v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Richard Nicholas v. Saul Stone & Company Company LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.