Legal Opinion

Middendorf v. Kansas Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1949No. 37,463PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for the alleged negligent transfer of corporate stock by the defendant. The defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiffs’ petition was sustained, and plaintiffs have appealed.

In the petition it was alleged that defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Kansas; that plaintiffs’ father, Gustav J. Plamann, was the owner of three certificates for ten shares each of the capital stock of the defendant corporation; that he made his last will and testament, by the terms of which he bequeathed all of his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marbury v. EhlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  2. Cole v. ThackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Baker v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Wooten v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frame, Administrator v. BaumanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Burling v. BurlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. In Re the Estate of NewlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Lindner v. Utah Southern Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cessna v. CarrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API