Legal Opinion

Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co. v. Richmond Cedar Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Decided November 22, 1906No. 28,245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judge.

This suit is brought to restrain defendants from infringing claim 1 of patent No. 535,465, granted to John Schro.eder, March 12* 1895, for new and useful improvements in “means for- operating washing machines.” . Claim 1. reads as follows:

*431“(I) An operating shaft having a rotary reciprocating motion, a cylinder placed upon the. shaft and having a sliding movement thereon, and through which cylinder motion is alone communicated to the shaft, and a double row of teeth or cogs upon the cylinder extending at an angle to the shaft, combined with a driving shaft having means…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brammer v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co. v. Simpson Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1904
  3. Union Casualty & Surety Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wayne Mfg. Co. v. Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co. v. StrausU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API