Legal Opinion

Long v. Mertz

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 15, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

21 N.J. Super. 401 (1952)

91 A.2d 341

OZA MERTZ LONG, AS ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM L. MERTZ AND ANOTHER, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued and decided September 15, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.

Mr. Raymond C. Connell argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Francis W. Hayden argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Crummy & Consodine, attorneys; Mr. Andrew B. Crummy, of counsel; Mr. John K. Bangs, on the brief).

At the conclusion of the argument, the court conferred and then affirmed the judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Haines v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Spencer v. FaircloughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blut v. KatzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Schmerer v. Estate of Marcus KirschenbaumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Sebring Associates. v. CoyleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Forrest v. ForrestNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Gibraltar Casualty Co. v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API